Me and my girlfriend were about to have sex. she was about to put the condom on me but thought it'd be funny to pretend like she was putting it in my mouth. She touched it to my tongue. It was horribly disgusting. thus killing my aroused state. FMSL

Sign up for more!

Comments

YDI, wimp. Plenty of women take condoms into their mouth every day. (To any other commenters, because I know I'm probably going to be asked wtf I'm talking about: some women apply condoms with their mouth, some women only give blowjobs if the guy is wearing a condom, etc.)

What the heck is wrong with her, that's not cool (unless you are into that sort of thing).

I definitely agree with your Miklee. I say YDI because that killed your "arousal." Just get the fuck over it, it's not like you can't get back into the mood.

I completely disagree with Miklee and ally... just because a girl doesn't get disgusted by having a dick in her mouth, doesn't mean I won't. And I can see that it's probably pretty easy to associate the taste of latex with that of the cack. If a girl did that to me, I'd probably lose my chub too.

Pinkstink, I could understand if it was a used condom, but a fresh, perfectly clean condom? No, it really shouldn't be that bad. As I said: wimp.

I still agree with myself and Miklee. Even if it did killed your erection, it's not like it won't come back. Big deal.

I've never tasted a condom before, but I'm pretty sure if you hadn't used it yet it would just taste like rubber or latex. Not real different than a rubber glove or a balloon. I feel like it's not that big of a deal. Especially since she only "touched it to your tongue" (Granted, if you had already finished using it, then yes. WHOLE 'nother story)

If there's a spermicide coating, it would taste really funky and nasty, a kinda chemical, bitter back taste kinda deal. And a guy who looses his wood doesn't magically pop back up, so sure, this one event may lead to a disappointing evening. Or disappointing hour until OP rinses his mouth, gets a blow job and rises to the occasion (or by any other means of any persuasion). OP obviously made a big deal about it and did not recover for several days.

Well tits, my boyfriend has gone down on me after having sex with a spermicide-coated condom, and he could taste it. But that didn't stop him from still going... Sure, his wood doesn't "magically pop back up," but it would take less than an hour if he hasn't cum yet. Waiting an hour to get it back up doesn't mean that his sex life sucks.

It's one of the internet's greatest losses that tone is lost in text. Though I provided a soft reason that may explain why the taste of a condom killed his aroused state (as he puts it), you'll find that my comment was not excusing the OP. It actually included whole sentences (can you find them?) concerning how OP should not have made a big deal about it. All in all, my comment told the OP that he should've shrugged off whatever horribly offensive taste that particular condom had (and it does vary by brand or even the condom's age), or at the very most, gone to rinse his mouth. His terribly traumatic issue could have been resolved within an hour or less, or even make the OP wait for another day. Either way, I was supporting the notion that his sex life does not suck. But you chose to nitpick about my time-frame, mention how appealing your boyfriend finds your genitals, and then add, "Waiting an hour to get it back up doesn't mean that his sex life sucks", which uses the time I allotted (which you found unreasonable based on your wonderful insta-cock boyfriend), and further more, supports my position, despite your disagreeable intention. I'm putting you on Santa's shit list.

Wow, good job getting overly sensitive and taking everything I said as a personal attack. I just disagreed with you and stated why, so I think you need to calm the fuck down. I agreed with most of what you said anyways and wanted to state a different position...which is apparently NOT okay with you.

That which aggravates me is that you didn't disagree with me. You just mentioned that your boyfriend continued his lappings despite the taste and that you had a problem with something as trivial as an estimated time frame. But you somehow felt like your personal experience was valuable enough to pseudo-disagree. Why does that aggravate me all that much? Because it's as if you read and understood what I said, and felt confident enough to reply so... condescendingly. I would rather you actually disagree with a valid point.

I don't have to say "I disagree because..." to make it a valid disagreement. I said that taste of the condom still shouldn't matter, and also, boohoo about the fact that it may take some time to get an erection again. It's the internet, stop getting "aggravated" that someone else disagrees...oh, and why does it bother you so much that I used my own experiences to make a point instead of rattling off something that I THINK is true? Get the hell over it. I don't care if you feel inadequate compared to what I've mentioned.

You still don't understand. You told OP to get over it, as did I. Do you not get that the amount of time it takes OP to bone does not matter? In the end, the mutual conclusion was that the OP is brainless and deserved that one; because this event does not conclude that his sex life sucks. The taste of a certain condom was just a little detail of consideration, but as you said he could've kept going. I said that OP could've just rinsed his mouth out, and kept going, so what exactly was your point of contention? Do you lack the ability to actually process what you read? Do you need little tabs in text where sarcasm is implied? You have no reasoned (or as I've been saying, valid) point. You just replied in full agreement (though it wasn't your intention) with the full support of a sample size of one. The best course of action for you is to revert to spouting assumptions concerning my inadequacies and my temperament. That or to sulk away as we both look like the stupid kind of fucks who argue on someone else's story.

The Saga continues...

lmao at mozart

Sorry for taking so long to reply, I was out having a life. Maybe I should erase that line because it's not really relevant? Who cares what I originally wrote, I was agreeing but also telling you that your reasoning doesn't matter in the situation. How many times do I have to say, "Get the fuck over it"? I was replying to you and stating a different point of view--it's what usually happens on something forum-style like this. You're just annoying at this point.

Add a comment

You must be a member to comment.

Sign Up Now! It's Free!